Former Idaho lawmaker discovered guilty of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial during which the younger girl fled the witness stand throughout testimony, saying “I can’t do that.”
The intern informed a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his apartment after the 2 had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger mentioned the sex was consensual.
At the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state representative, but he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was discovered guilty Friday of rape. He was found not guilty of sexual penetration with a overseas object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the verdict was read, as he has throughout the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Judge Michael Reardon informed the jury: “This has been an uncommon case attended by many sudden circumstances, however I appreciate your attention ... and onerous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimum sentence of 1 12 months in prison in Idaho. The maximum penalty could be as high as life in jail, at the decide’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly along with his legal professional who removed items from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, but as soon as they reached a lower ground they stopped to briefly to congratulate one another on the verdict.
Von Ehlinger’s legal professional, Jon Cox, couldn't be instantly reached for remark after the trial.
The Related Press usually doesn't establish individuals who say they have been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the girl on this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press convention, Ada County Prosecuting Legal professional Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who handled the case.
“Last however not least, it took an incredible quantity of braveness for the victim in this case, Jane Doe, to return forward,” Bennetts said. “I need to acknowledge the braveness that she took in coming forward.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault started, earlier than abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to put his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe mentioned.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do that,” she mentioned, shortly strolling out of the courtroom.
The judge gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to find her to determine if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she didn't, the choose informed the jurors they needed to “strike (Doe’s testimony) out of your minds as if it by no means happened,” because the protection could not cross-examine her.
During the press conference, Deputy Prosecuting Lawyer Katelyn Farley said the second Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” however mentioned she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had prepared for trial figuring out that Doe may not be able to testify.
“I believe it’s necessary that she determined to stroll within the room, and she or he additionally decided to stroll out — these have been her selections,” Welsh mentioned.
During his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger typically spoke in a clear, loud voice on to jurors, saying he and Doe decided to return to his condo to “hang out” after eating at a fancy Boise restaurant. Then they started making out on the sofa, he mentioned.
“Issues had been going properly, and I requested (Doe) if she would like to move to the bedroom,” von Ehlinger said. “She stated ‘Certain.’ We obtained up, held palms and walked into the bedroom.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours till almost 8 p.m. Thursday before the jury determined to break for the night. At one point, the choose summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury requested a query. No details were made public about the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations grew to become public — largely because of the legislative ethics investigation — Doe confronted unrelenting harassment from a few of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her identify, photo and private details about her life had been repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of many individuals who ceaselessly harassed her was in the courthouse to attend the trial, however regulation enforcement banned the man from the ground the place the case was being heard.
Throughout closing arguments, Farley instructed jurors that the case was about “power in the fallacious palms” used to the “great devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and bodily power over the petite intern, Farley said.
“He used that energy to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley said, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in a number of methods, she stated, highlighting the testimony of law enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Phrases show lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t happen’ present lack of consent. Yanking your head back and getting an damage shows lack of consent,” Farley mentioned.
However von Ehlinger’s lawyer instructed jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “crimson herrings,” and said von Ehlinger was a reputable person who willingly took the stand to share his side of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who carried out the sexual assault exam testified earlier this week. They said Doe reported being pinned down whereas von Ehlinger forced her to perform oral sex, and that she knew he regularly carried a handgun and had positioned it on a dresser near the bed on the time of the assault. The nurse also testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the again of her head from placing the wall or a headboard whereas making an attempt to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.