Former Idaho lawmaker discovered guilty of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial by which the young woman fled the witness stand during testimony, saying “I can’t do that.”
The intern advised a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his condominium after the 2 had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger mentioned the sex was consensual.
At the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state consultant, but he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was found responsible Friday of rape. He was discovered not responsible of sexual penetration with a foreign object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the decision was read, as he has all through the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Decide Michael Reardon advised the jury: “This has been an uncommon case attended by many surprising circumstances, however I recognize your consideration ... and arduous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimal sentence of one 12 months in prison in Idaho. The maximum penalty could be as excessive as life in prison, on the choose’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly with his legal professional who eliminated gadgets from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, however as soon as they reached a decrease ground they stopped to briefly to congratulate each other on the decision.
Von Ehlinger’s lawyer, Jon Cox, couldn't be instantly reached for remark after the trial.
The Associated Press typically doesn't identify individuals who say they've been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the lady in this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press conference, Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who dealt with the case.
“Last but not least, it took an incredible amount of braveness for the sufferer in this case, Jane Doe, to return forward,” Bennetts said. “I wish to acknowledge the braveness that she took in coming ahead.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault began, before abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to put his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe stated.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do this,” she mentioned, rapidly walking out of the courtroom.
The judge gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to find her to determine if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she didn't, the judge instructed the jurors they had to “strike (Doe’s testimony) from your minds as if it by no means happened,” because the protection could not cross-examine her.
Throughout the press convention, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Katelyn Farley said the moment Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” however stated she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had prepared for trial figuring out that Doe might not be capable to testify.
“I think it’s necessary that she decided to walk within the room, and she or he additionally determined to walk out — these were her decisions,” Welsh said.
Throughout his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger often spoke in a clear, loud voice on to jurors, saying he and Doe decided to return to his apartment to “hang out” after eating at a fancy Boise restaurant. Then they started making out on the sofa, he stated.
“Things have been going effectively, and I asked (Doe) if she would like to transfer to the bed room,” von Ehlinger stated. “She stated ‘Positive.’ We obtained up, held palms and walked into the bed room.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours till practically 8 p.m. Thursday before the jury determined to break for the evening. At one point, the decide summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury asked a query. No details have been made public concerning the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations grew to become public — largely due to the legislative ethics investigation — Doe confronted unrelenting harassment from a few of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her name, picture and private details about her life had been repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of the people who incessantly harassed her was in the courthouse to attend the trial, however regulation enforcement banned the man from the floor where the case was being heard.
During closing arguments, Farley informed jurors that the case was about “energy within the incorrect fingers” used to the “nice devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and bodily energy over the petite intern, Farley mentioned.
“He used that energy to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley mentioned, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in a number of methods, she mentioned, highlighting the testimony of regulation enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Phrases show lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t happen’ present lack of consent. Yanking your head back and getting an damage shows lack of consent,” Farley said.
But von Ehlinger’s legal professional told jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “crimson herrings,” and mentioned von Ehlinger was a reputable one who willingly took the stand to share his aspect of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who carried out the sexual assault exam testified earlier this week. They said Doe reported being pinned down while von Ehlinger pressured her to carry out oral intercourse, and that she knew he incessantly carried a handgun and had positioned it on a dresser close to the bed on the time of the assault. The nurse also testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the again of her head from placing the wall or a headboard whereas trying to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.