Former Idaho lawmaker found guilty of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial during which the young girl fled the witness stand throughout testimony, saying “I can’t do this.”
The intern instructed a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his residence after the two had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger stated the intercourse was consensual.
At the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state representative, but he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was discovered responsible Friday of rape. He was discovered not guilty of sexual penetration with a foreign object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the decision was learn, as he has all through the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Choose Michael Reardon instructed the jury: “This has been an unusual case attended by many surprising circumstances, however I admire your consideration ... and onerous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimal sentence of 1 year in prison in Idaho. The utmost penalty can be as high as life in prison, on the decide’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly with his lawyer who eliminated items from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, but as soon as they reached a lower floor they stopped to briefly to congratulate each other on the verdict.
Von Ehlinger’s attorney, Jon Cox, couldn't be instantly reached for comment after the trial.
The Related Press usually does not identify people who say they've been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the woman on this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press conference, Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who dealt with the case.
“Last however not least, it took an incredible amount of courage for the victim on this case, Jane Doe, to come back forward,” Bennetts mentioned. “I want to acknowledge the braveness that she took in coming forward.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault began, earlier than abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to place his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe mentioned.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do that,” she mentioned, quickly strolling out of the courtroom.
The choose gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to search out her to determine if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she didn't, the judge informed the jurors they had to “strike (Doe’s testimony) out of your minds as if it by no means happened,” as a result of the protection couldn't cross-examine her.
Throughout the press convention, Deputy Prosecuting Legal professional Katelyn Farley said the second Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” however mentioned she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had prepared for trial realizing that Doe could not be capable of testify.
“I think it’s essential that she decided to walk within the room, and she or he additionally decided to stroll out — those have been her choices,” Welsh said.
Throughout his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger usually spoke in a transparent, loud voice directly to jurors, saying he and Doe determined to return to his condominium to “hang out” after eating at a fancy Boise restaurant. Then they started making out on the couch, he mentioned.
“Things have been going well, and I requested (Doe) if she would like to transfer to the bedroom,” von Ehlinger stated. “She said ‘Positive.’ We got up, held arms and walked into the bed room.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours until nearly 8 p.m. Thursday before the jury determined to interrupt for the night. At one point, the choose summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury requested a question. No details were made public concerning the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations turned public — largely due to the legislative ethics investigation — Doe faced unrelenting harassment from some of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her name, picture and private particulars about her life were repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of many people who ceaselessly harassed her was within the courthouse to attend the trial, however law enforcement banned the man from the ground where the case was being heard.
During closing arguments, Farley informed jurors that the case was about “power in the incorrect palms” used to the “nice devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and bodily energy over the petite intern, Farley stated.
“He used that power to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley stated, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in several methods, she mentioned, highlighting the testimony of legislation enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Phrases present lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t happen’ present lack of consent. Yanking your head again and getting an damage shows lack of consent,” Farley said.
However von Ehlinger’s lawyer instructed jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “purple herrings,” and stated von Ehlinger was a credible one who willingly took the stand to share his facet of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who carried out the sexual assault exam testified earlier this week. They said Doe reported being pinned down whereas von Ehlinger forced her to perform oral intercourse, and that she knew he regularly carried a handgun and had positioned it on a dresser near the mattress at the time of the assault. The nurse also testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the again of her head from placing the wall or a headboard whereas trying to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.